Attack is the best form of defense Game-2

This is the second game in this series:
We learnt that it is not just the counterattacking side who may go wrong.
In the following game between Taimanov and Larsen we will study that without great risk of being wrong we can name the factors by which Larsen was guided. Firstly, after 1.. g5 he slightly assumed that such a turn of events would be extremely unexpected for white. Secondly, from the calm waters of positional pressure in the centre, White has to plunge into deep complications where the probability of mistake increases many times.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A day with Harish Kumar

Image
Today I took interview of a well known Chess Coach from Karnataka,Mr. Harish Kumar. He has got 12 years experience as a chess coach who has a lot of patience to teach his students. Now lets see the interview Q1. Sir when were you first introduced to the game? A1. I was first introduced to the game of chess at the age of 9 while my uncle was playing chess with his friends. Q2. When you first saw them playing the game of chess for the first time what was your reaction? A2. I was keenly interested to learn the game,though I was introduced to the traditional chess and did not know the technical name of the pieces. Q3. How did you learn modern chess? A3. I learnt modern chess through my teacher Mr.Krishna Moorthy,the founder of Anand Chess Club in my school. Q4. How did you continue your chess career? A4. I started my professional career by playing some local chess events and school tournaments and later played in District and State level too. Q5. What are your achiev
Read more

180 degree turn Game-2

This is the second game in this topic, This game is played by Ex-World Champion Max Euwe who made excellent use of latent counterattacking factors in the game. The white queen/knight battery which is threatening to fire after Bxh7+ the pin on the knight at e5, plus the opponent's weaknesses on the a2-g8 diagonal- all this suggests that White has more than sufficient compensation for the pawn and that his activity is very dangerous. But Assessment of the position was changed by the brilliant 21...g5!! Play Online Chess [Event "?"] [Site "Nottingham"] [Date "1936.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Vidmar"] [Black "Euwe"] [Result "*"] [WhiteELO "?"] [BlackELO "?"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "2br1rk1/1pq3pp/pbp2p2/4n3/R3BB2/3N2P1/1PQ1PP1P/5RK1 b KQkq - 0 1"] %Created by Caissa's Web PGN Editor 1... g5 2. Bxh7+ Qxh7 3. Bxe5 Ba7 4. Bc3 b5 5. Raa1 c5 6. Qc1 c4
Read more

Elimination of Candidate Moves Masters Section

Masters often claim that one should consider every reasonable candidate moves, analyze each of them once and only once and make a final decision about which move to play only after you are absolutely certain of its consequences. But in their own games masters often ignore all of this advice.They recognize a move that is so evidently good that to them it really is "obvious." In the position below, Black has just played Bc7. White immediately recognizes the simplest move: His rook is attacked and he can capture Black's rook with 1.Rxf8+. He also sees that 1.. Kxf8 would enable him to attack the h-pawn with 2.Qh5. And on 1..Bxf8 there may be something like 2.Qg4+. Every strong player would see this fairly quickly,regardless of whether they are "combinational" or "positional" or strategic" or whatever stereotype terms are used. They  all have the vision. 1.Ra7 White also noticed how this move would create at least three new tactical possibilities
Read more